PDF icon Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2616-4716
Original Article

Career Paths After Microsurgery Fellowship: A 10-Year Analysis

Elaine Lin 
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Tara Pillai
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Victoria N. Yi
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ann Marie Flusche
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Sakshi Chopra
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Melissa Tran
1   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ash Patel
2   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Kristen M. Rezak
2   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available atMedOne
   Permissions and Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Background

Over the past 10 years, microsurgery fellowship programs and positions have increased by 50%, underscoring the need to understand graduate career paths and provide trainees context about future practice. This study analyzed who pursues microsurgery fellowships and factors associated with academic careers.

Methods

This cross-sectional analysis examined graduates from the past 10 years from fellowships recognized by the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery or graduates of international fellowships who completed residency in the United States. Demographic variables included gender, race, residency location, and integrated versus independent plastic surgery residency. bibliometric indices at the time of graduation and October 2024 were measured. Initial and current practice settings were categorized as academic (full-time faculty), “private affiliated” (involved in teaching but not full-time faculty), or private practice.

Results

Overall, 423 graduates were identified. The majority were male (62.9%) and White (63.4%). Most completed Integrated residency (72.6%). Five fellowships accounted for 48.0% of graduates: MD Anderson (80), Memorial Sloan Kettering (46), University of Pennsylvania (38), Stanford University (23), and The Buncke Clinic (16). After fellowship, 68.0% of graduates entered academia, and 63.2% of graduates are in academia currently out of 419 analyzed. Fellowship location was associated with initial academic practice (p = 0.01), many graduates from International (80.0%), and Southern (78.4%) fellowships entering academia. Graduates in initial academic practice had higher median initial g-index (13 vs. 10, p = 0.03) and median initial publications (15 vs. 11, p = 0.02). Multiple logistic regression found initial publications and fellowship location to be the best predictors of initial academic practice.

Conclusion

While most graduates pursue academia, a significant number enter private practice, indicating it is a viable option. Southern or International fellowships send more graduates into academia, but this is likely influenced by popular fellowships. Nuanced factors like personal preference, financial considerations, and networking likely play a significant role in career choices.

Keywords

microsurgery - fellowship - employment

Author Contributions

The project was conceived by E.L., A.P., and K.R. Data collection was performed by E.L., T.P., V.Y., A.F., S.C., and M.T. Statistical analyses were conceptualized by E.L., A.P., and K.R., and performed by E.L. The initial manuscript was drafted by E.L. The final manuscript was written with the input and approval of all authors.




Publication History

Received: 18 December 2024

Accepted: 12 May 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 May 2025

Article published online:
13 June 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA